Pepsi Succeeds In Vacating $1.26 Billion Default Judgment

New-pepsi-logo.JPGA couple of weeks ago we talked about how Pepsi mishandled a Complaint suing the company for allegedly stealing trade secrets resulting in a $1.26 Billion default judgment.

In Judge Scraps $1.26 Billion Judgment Against Pepsi, the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel's Bruce Vielmetti reports that the Honorable Jacqueline Erwin, the judge hearing the case, granted Pepsi's motion to vacate the default judgment. Judge Erwin will now hear the case "on its merits." And according to Pepsi's lawyers, the company has some very meritorious defenses.

Pepsi lawyers, executives, and shareholders must be pleased. The gentlemen who sued Pepsi - Wisconsin businessmen Charles Joyce and James Voigt - probably aren't so pleased.

Learning from our mistakes is good. Learning from the mistakes of others is better, and cheaper:

  • wacky-shocked-baby-with-clipping-path-thumb513604.jpgPrepare to get sued by ensuring that you, your registered agents, and everyone in your organization knows how to recognize a Complaint and what to do with it after getting it.
  • If you sue someone and they don't respond to the Complaint on time, don't ask for stratospheric damages. That'll just make it so much easier for the judge to grant your opponent's request to vacate. Joyce and Voight's odds would have been a lot better if their judgment was for $126,000, or maybe even $1.26 Million. But they never had a chance with that eye-popping $1.26 Billion. Remember: pigs get fat, hogs get slaughtered

Trackbacks (0) Links to blogs that reference this article Trackback URL
Comments (1) Read through and enter the discussion with the form at the end
Mark Cobb Law Group - November 16, 2009 10:19 PM

Hi Josh, I always enjoy reading your blogs, and I am amazed at the great information you share. I thought I would share some additional information.

In Georgia, preferred service of lawsuits is upon the corporation's Registered Agent. Our service is strictly construed and, unless there is a court order, the sheriff must personally serve the registered agent.

The sheriff, however, is allowed to leave a lawsuit with another responsible adult in a business IF that responsible adult affirmatively claims to have authority for the Registered Agent. We strongly urge our clients to instruct all employees to that only the registered agent is allowed to accept paperwork from any police officer. If possible, we add this to the employee handbook to avoid in an attempt to help our clients avoid default judgments.

Best regards,

Mark Cobb

Post A Comment / Question Use this form to add a comment to this entry.







Remember personal info?
Send To A Friend Use this form to send this entry to a friend via email.