FDIC's D'Oench, Duhme Doctrine: Don't Let It Doom Debt Work-Outs and Restructurings
In the last bank insolvency post we talked about how the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (the "FDIC") can revive limitations periods even after they expire. Today we'll talk about another of the FDIC's extraordinary powers - the D'Oench, Duhme doctrine and it's companions.
D'Oench, Duhme gets its name from the 1942 U.S. Supreme Court decision in D'Oench, Duhme & Co., Inc. v. FDIC. After the FDIC takes over as receiver of a failed bank, that decision, along with many that follow it, spells doom for many a borrower.
In a nutshell, after the FDIC gets appointed as receiver for a failed bank, the D'Oench, Duhme doctrine and its companions allow the FDIC to ignore select pre-Appointment Date agreements and deals between bank representatives on one side and their borrowers and guarantors on the other. Agreements that commonly fall victim are debt work-outs and restructurings that often include features like:
- Extending a promissory note's maturity date
- Reducing an interest rate
- Suspending, deferring, or reducing principal payments, and even interest payments
- Waiving fees and other payments (e.g., prepayment premiums)
- Waiving non-money defaults
- Waiving or reducing so-called "default interest" at higher than original rate
- Releasing guaranties
The FDIC refusing to honor these kinds of agreements can doom borrowers, guarantors, and the projects they're working on. It doesn't matter if they're an owner under a construction loan or a contractor subcontractor, material supplier, or design professional under a working capital loan or line of credit.
As you learn about what D'Oench, Duhme can do, you'll recognize that it's a boon for whomever buys the affected loans from the FDIC. It's meant to work that way. More on that in future posts.

Construction Law Today is a legal blog about construction contracts, disputes, finance, and the people whose job it is to deal with them.